commons-sentience-sandbox

Civic Continuum Reviewer Dashboard

Purpose

This dashboard gives a reviewer a fast, honest view of what exists, what is being built, and what still requires independent work. It is a progress map, not a claim that every concept is a functioning product.

Review entry points

Start with	Evidence available now	Honest status
Maya Node	Consent-token architecture, scoped authority, expiry, revocation, runtime checks, and audit evidence	Implemented/tested software components; not certification
SAGE Situated Companion	Situated runtime, owner identity, bounded capability grants, sovereignty bridge, and recovery controls	Controlled software demonstrator; not a production autonomous companion
Reality Audit	Evidence stages, calibration discipline, failure preservation, and review gates	Research-assurance workbench
Flux Drive formal-review draft	Closure equations, uncertainty, nuisance models, controls, and bench plan	Paper/software package; no validated propulsion
Programmable vehicle-surface draft	Optical, electrical, thermal, curvature, safe-state, and coupon-test specification	Paper feasibility; no tested coupon or road approval

What changed on September 19, 2026

Reconciled the Flux Drive outreach record against Sent mail and added a deduplication registry so laboratories are not repeatedly cold-contacted.
Preserved the Aerospace Systems rejection as a publication outcome with no reviewer comments; it is neither validation nor experimental falsification.
Added an Aurora / Flux revision gate with explicit impulse closure, covariance-aware uncertainty, nuisance models, reversal controls, energy accounting, control families, and resubmission stop conditions.
Added and corrected the programmable fiber-optic vehicle-surface Blue Book, including prior-art boundaries and a stationary 600 mm × 600 mm coupon gate.
Located close fiber-optic automotive-panel prior art. The broad idea of a flexible fiber-optic vehicle panel is not represented as newly established; any protectable improvement requires claim-specific review.
Kept protected geometry, supplier terms, fabrication drawings, credentials, patent-sensitive variants, and security-sensitive implementation outside the public repository.

Dr. Thomas readiness meter

The three organizational conditions are tracked in a separate, evidence-scored checklist: Dr. Thomas Organizational Readiness Meter. The current score is 15 of 18 verified checks (83%). Domain infrastructure is documented and the accountable structure is published. Formal Washington formation, UBI, and business licensing remain open, so the overall gate is not complete and must not be represented as approval or independent verification.

Organizational verification gate

Dr. Thomas Ainsworth asked that substantive collaboration wait until three items can be independently verified:

formal business registration;
business-domain infrastructure; and
accountable organizational structure.

Technical documentation may continue improving while the registration gate is open. The domain is now live at https://civiccontinuum.org/, the role-based contact is contact@civiccontinuum.org, and the public accountability package is available through the organizational verification page. No later email should imply that the Washington organization is registered, licensed, independently verified, or ready for a formal relationship until the missing public records and outsider-verification steps exist.

Evidence meter

[1/6] Concept — defined idea or source record
[2/6] Paper — bounded specification, assumptions, and non-claims
[3/6] Test — reproducible test plan and pass/fail/stop criteria
[4/6] Prototype — software, tabletop, or bench artifact
[5/6] Review — independent technical, safety, legal, or rights review
[6/6] Pilot — supervised real-world use with support and correction procedures

A project may move backward when testing exposes a flaw. That is recorded as progress in the evidence system, not hidden.

Priority workstreams

Workstream	Current evidence target	Current priority
Maya Node Founding Review	Repeatable human-delivered review workflow	Highest
Consent Token / CERL demonstrator	Grant, deny, expire, revoke, freeze, restore, audit verification	Highest
Systems Accountability curriculum	One genuinely teachable module with exercises and assessment	Highest
SAGE situated companion	Private controlled demo with permission and recovery boundaries	High
Flux Drive / Aurora	Measurement-grade paper package and falsification protocol; no propulsion claim	High
Crowned Coil	Safe non-confidential product brief and supplier/NDA process	High
Reality Audit	Reproducible analysis, calibration, blinding, and limitations	High

Portfolio status

#	Project	Current stage	Next evidence gate
1	Maya Node Founding Review	[3/6] Test	Three supervised reviews
2	SAGE Situated Companion	[3/6] Test	Private demo
3	MAYA SAGE Sovereign Continuity	[2/6] Paper	Design-partner review
4	CERL Preemptive Consent Validator	[2/6] Paper	Demonstrator
5	CERL 1.0 Governance Framework	[2/6] Paper	Counsel review
6	Commons Unified Protocol	[2/6] Paper	Two-node demo
7	Consent Token	[3/6] Test	Software pilot
8	Commons Sentience Sandbox	[4/6] Prototype	Research walkthrough
9	Reality Audit Sandbox	[4/6] Prototype	Methods review
10	Lantern Protocols	[2/6] Paper	Education pilot
11	Foundational Operating System	[2/6] Paper	Narrow policy-engine proof
12	Systemic Failure Index	[2/6] Paper	Statistics review
13	Structural Illegality Block	[2/6] Paper	Security review
14	Commons Global Node Architecture	[2/6] Paper	Two-node prototype
15	Commons Charter and Constitution	[2/6] Paper	Public consultation
16	Custodianship Economy and Life Credits	[2/6] Paper	Mutual-aid pilot
17	Aurora AI Core	[3/6] Test	Software review
18	Aurora Embodied Vessel	[2/6] Paper	Tabletop demo
19	Aurora DIY Vessel Build Book	[2/6] Paper	Safety-reviewed beta
20	Aurora Mini Vessel Experiment Bed	[2/6] Paper	Bench partner
21	Aurora City Ship	[1/6] Concept	Aerospace requirements review
22	Flux Drive / Inertial Mass Regulator	[3/6] Test	Blinded momentum-closure test
23	MPRS Scout Ground Robot	[2/6] Paper	Tabletop prototype
24	MPRS Phase Sync / Matter Phasing	[1/6] Concept	Physics review
25	Mobile Resilience Hub Vehicle	[2/6] Paper	Conventional systems review
26	CISE Electric Bike Module	[2/6] Paper	Mechanical review
27	Gyroscopic Flexible Tether Deployment	[2/6] Paper	Guarded tabletop test
28	Bio-Regenerative Limb	[1/6] Concept	Qualified biomedical review
29	Neural Interface Biogel	[1/6] Concept	Biocompatibility review
30	Cybernetic Anchor and Frame	[1/6] Concept	Load-path review
31	Energy and Substrate System	[1/6] Concept	Conventional energy boundary
32	Quantum Consciousness Vehicle / QRN	[1/6] Concept	Physics review
33	Harmonic Temporal Alignment / Warp Navigation	[1/6] Concept	Relativity review
34	Resonant Dimensional Bridges	[1/6] Concept	Theory review
35	Bridging Consciousness and Geometry	[2/6] Paper	Preregistered measurable experiment
36	PFHMS Shield	[1/6] Concept	Threat-model clarification
37	Commons Open SAA Protocol	[1/6] Concept	Recovered specification
38	CRTS Replication	[1/6] Concept	Scope clarification
39	CALEXS Deep Experience	[1/6] Concept	No-code user research
40	Autonomous Transmission Network	[2/6] Paper	Consent-scoped two-node test
41	Continuum Archive	[2/6] Paper	Archive pilot
42	Commons Defense Network	[1/6] Concept	Non-weaponized safety review
43	Gaia Restoration and Rewilding	[1/6] Concept	Local ecological test
44	Commons Habitat / Bio-resonant City	[1/6] Concept	Resource and governance model
45	Bioforge and Organ Weaving	[1/6] Concept	Institutional ethics review
46	Flux Veins / Zero-Loss Energy Grid	[1/6] Concept	Conventional efficiency study
47	Solar Republic / Kinship Governance	[2/6] Paper	Workshop pilot
48	Green Energy Acceleration Project	[2/6] Paper	Costed policy review
49	Mya Auth Handshake	[2/6] Paper	Security review
50	Commons Provenance Lock / Public Archive	[3/6] Test	Public release verification

What a serious reviewer can do next

Inspect the portfolio index and registry.
Select one bounded workstream.
Review its assumptions, non-claims, tests, and failure criteria.
Request the private material only through an appropriate NDA or review process.
Reproduce the public software or analysis where possible.
Report disagreements and failed replications.
Fund or partner on the next decisive gate—not on an unsupported end-state claim.

Important boundary

Flux Drive is not independently validated propulsion. Aurora is not a validated flying city-ship. Biomedical concepts are not medical devices. SAGE is not a production-ready autonomous companion. The value of this repository is the visible path from ambitious concept to falsifiable, reviewable work.

Public links

This site is open source. Improve this page.